Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <kernel@...>

Subject: Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008

Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 - 10:51 pm

Matthew Dillon wrote:
quoted text>     Here's what is left:
>      * Structural locking.  The B-Tree is fine-grained locked but the
>        locks for the blockmap are just a hack (one big lock).

Have you decided how to implement multi-master replication yet?


--
Jason Smethers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, Matthew Dillon, (Sun Feb 10, 5:19 pm)

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, Bill Hacker, (Mon Feb 11, 4:08 am)

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, Adrian Chadd, (Mon Feb 11, 4:50 am)

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, Bill Hacker, (Mon Feb 11, 6:34 am)

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, Jason Smethers, (Sun Feb 10, 10:51 pm)

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008, walt, (Sun Feb 10, 9:41 pm)


linux-kernel:
David Miller	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
debian developer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Roland Dreier	Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git:

openbsd-misc:

linux-netdev:
Arjan van de Ven	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Paul E. McKenney	Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49

Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008

Online users