Matthew Dillon wrote:I'm fond of telling political hotheads (which you once were, but no longer ;o) that, before they destroy the system devised by their predecessors, they owe it to themselves to stop and find out exactly what problems their predecessors thought they were solving when they invented the existing system. So -- in this instance you are both the establishment and the revolutionary at the same time. Could you explain in extra-bonehead language what problems you were solving with the cluster model, and if you are still solving those problems with the newer model? Thanks!
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
