At 4:22 PM -0800 2/8/08, Matthew Dillon wrote:I'd go with 1.2 for now. A nice, known-stable release with an experimental feature which isn't quite ready yet. And then release 2.0 with HAMMER known to be good, solid, and well-tested. If you're going to make a big deal about HAMMER, then it would be doubly-plus-good to be confident that all the pieces of it have seen some stress-testing. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
| Ryan Hope | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Tim Tassonis | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 |
| hooanon05 | [PATCH 63/67] aufs mount helper |
git: | |
| Petko Manolov | git and binary files |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Jeff King | Re: Use of tac in git-rebase--interactive |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Julien TOUCHE | setting up ssh tunnel/vpn |
| Ray Percival | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Michael | Performance: OpenVPN vs IPsec |
| Pietro Cerutti | Re: [patch] enhance powerd(8) to handle max temperature |
| Søren Schmidt | Re: Patch RFC: Promise SATA300 TX4 hardware bug workaround. |
| Kris Kennaway | Re: Problems with FreeBSD 6.0 |
| Ceri Davies | Using any network interface whatsoever |
