Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 11:01 am

Hasso Tepper wrote:

Con. Imho, it's better to keep things like these in one place, for 
easier maintenance and collision-spotting. The problem is we didn't 
really inherit pcidevs from FreeBSD, but added it later on, making lots 
of drivers ill-adjusted, or not adjusted at all, to pcidevs.


pci_vendors is from upstream, and does not necessarily correspond with 
what we want to present to the user.

Also, about drivers not using device strings, they should; but since we 
inherited pcidevs-less drivers from FreeBSD, only a small amount has 
been adapted to suit pcidevs.

Cheers,
-- 
         Thomas E. Spanjaard
         tgen@netphreax.net
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Hasso Tepper, (Thu Sep 27, 8:11 am)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Hasso Tepper, (Sun Oct 28, 3:43 pm)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Thomas E. Spanjaard, (Thu Sep 27, 11:01 am)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Sascha Wildner, (Thu Sep 27, 12:12 pm)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Sascha Wildner, (Thu Sep 27, 12:17 pm)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Sepherosa Ziehau, (Thu Sep 27, 10:14 am)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Hasso Tepper, (Fri Sep 28, 1:33 am)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Justin C. Sherrill, (Thu Sep 27, 10:19 am)
Re: RFC: nuke pcidevs and usbdevs, Hasso Tepper, (Thu Sep 27, 2:55 pm)