login
Header Space

 
 

Re: dcons_crom and bus_generic_identify_sameunit()

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 11:57 am

On Saturday 27 October 2007, Matthew Dillon wrote

Well, when bus_generic_identify_sameunit() returns zero without calling 
BUS_ADD_CHILD() first, the dcons_crom_{probe,attach} methods don't get 
called. Unless I'm completely misreading the code DS_ATTACHED shouldn't be 
set. BTW, naming the device_t parameter in bus_generic_identify*() 
as "parent" is confusing because AFAICT this is the actual device, not any 
ancestor.

If the bug isn't obvious don't waste any time on it, I want to read some of 
the bus/device code anyway, so I'll investigate some more. Just give me a 
couple of weeks to finish with my exams and rest a bit first...

Aggelos
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: dcons_crom and bus_generic_identify_sameunit(), Matthew Dillon, (Fri Oct 26, 11:51 pm)
Re: dcons_crom and bus_generic_identify_sameunit(), Aggelos Economopoulos, (Sun Oct 28, 11:57 am)
speck-geostationary