Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:I can only say that Xen looks like a good idea also - it's a VM system that doesn't really depend on host (and if you have hardware VM support) guest OS, and it even has some virtual system migration (over the network) built-in. Supporting Xen would automatically mean DFly can run more available guest OS-es, not only DFly. On the other hand, while NetBSD has got Xen running relatively easy, FreeBSD is still struggling with it, with no usable results. See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq (go for Xen 3.0)
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set... |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
