I'm just sitting on the side watching DfBSD because I applaud the effort, which, imho, is in the right direction. I do not at present have any time to devote to it, nor any expertise. Anyway, a comment... Matthew D. Fuller wrote:I was also thinking about this - an archive / restore function for the configuration, which the OTS would then build on any given machine. I, being inherently lazy, would also like to see (pardon if it's been mentioned and I missed it) something like the Mac OS X update. A cron job that runs while I'm sleeping, which runs an "OTS -magic_update", sees that a security patch has been made to the kernel, downloads the patch, rebuild the kernel using my customized config file, rebuilds all dependent packages/ports, installs, reboots (in the case of a kernel patch, re-init "-HUP", for a port) and sends me an e-mail about it for me to read in the morning. Is this too much to ask. :-)) Walter
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Mike Travis | [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Dave Jones | agp / cpufreq. |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 14/37] dccp: Tidy up setsockopt calls |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
