Re: Packaging system effort

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Walter
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2004 - 10:43 am

I'm just sitting on the side watching DfBSD because I
applaud the effort, which, imho, is in the right direction.
I do not at present have any time to devote to it, nor
any expertise.  Anyway, a comment...

Matthew D. Fuller wrote:


I was also thinking about this - an archive / restore function
for the configuration, which the OTS would then build on any
given machine.

I, being inherently lazy, would also like to see (pardon if
it's been mentioned and I missed it) something like the Mac
OS X update. A cron job that runs while I'm sleeping, which
runs an "OTS -magic_update", sees that a security patch has
been made to the kernel, downloads the patch, rebuild the
kernel using my customized config file, rebuilds all dependent
packages/ports, installs, reboots (in the case of a kernel
patch, re-init "-HUP", for a port) and sends me an e-mail
about it for me to read in the morning.  Is this too much to
ask. :-))

Walter
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Packaging system effort, Simon 'corecode' Sch ..., (Thu Feb 26, 5:36 am)
Re: Packaging system effort, Josh Elsasser, (Thu Feb 26, 9:45 am)
Re: Packaging system effort, Matthew D. Fuller, (Thu Feb 26, 9:58 am)
Re: Packaging system effort, Joerg Sonnenberger, (Thu Feb 26, 10:43 am)
Re: Packaging system effort, Walter, (Thu Feb 26, 10:43 am)
Re: Packaging system effort, Dan Melomedman, (Thu Feb 26, 12:02 pm)
Re: Packaging system effort, Matthew D. Fuller, (Thu Feb 26, 12:15 pm)
Re: Packaging system effort, Peter Kadau, (Thu Feb 26, 3:37 pm)
Re: Packaging system effort, Dan Melomedman, (Thu Feb 26, 3:46 pm)
Re: Packaging system effort, Chris Pressey, (Thu Feb 26, 5:16 pm)