"You are absolutely deluded, if not stupid, if you think that a worldwide collection of software engineers who can't write operating systems or applications without security holes, can then turn around and suddenly write virtualization layers without security holes."
| magical mounts | 3 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| Problem in scim in Fedora 9 | 4 hours ago | Linux general |
| The new Western Digital power saving drives | 4 hours ago | Hardware |
| Battery Maximizer Software | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| windows folder creation surprise | 1 day ago | Windows |
| Firewall | 1 day ago | OpenBSD |
| IP layer send packet | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| dtrace for linux available | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| Unable to mount ramdisk image using UBoot while upgrading to 2.6.15 kernel for a MPC8540 based target | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| RealTek RTL8169 - can't connect | 3 days ago | NetBSD |
Amen to that, Theo :)
Amen to that, Theo :)
Theo's way of dealing with
Theo's way of dealing with issues outside his utopia is to ignore them. Virtualization provides a great deal of value for many reasons.
Value
Yes, and security isn't one of them.
They said value, as in cheap
They said value, as in cheap ;)
Value was never argued,
Value was never argued, what's the point of your reply?
OpenBSD is more expensive
If OpenBSD does not support "cheap" solutions then it's more expensive than the competing operating systems which do. It's that simple.